← Case Library  /  AUTH/2102/2/08
AUTH/2102/2/08 Transfers of Value Not Upheld 2008

Meda Pharmaceuticals

Clauses: 15.9,3.2
🔒
Full video requires subscription
Subscribe from £199/year to access the full expert walkthrough, podcast and MCQs.
Sign in to subscribe
🎧
Podcast Episode 🔒 Subscribe to listen to this case as a podcast
Unlock

📋 Case Summary

What happened An anonymous company representative complained about Meda Pharmaceuticals Limited’s promotion of Aldara (imiquimod cream) and the activities of its representatives. Concerns included: (1) call-rate expectations introduced in January 2008; (2) use of a letter to doctors (a “GPwSI letter”) to gain appointments; and (3) alleged encouragement to promote Aldara off licence to maxillofacial units and plastic surgeons. The Panel reviewed salesforce briefing materials and emails about customer targets, including a slide stating call frequency was to be within ABPI guidelines and setting quarterly coverage/frequency expectations for 100 target GPs. The Panel considered the Code’s supplementary information that unsolicited calls on a doctor/prescriber should normally not exceed three per year on average (with specified exclusions), and noted briefing material should distinguish between expected call rates and contact rates. For the letter, Meda stated it had been certified and pres

📌 Clauses Breached

15.9,3.2

🔒
Subscribe for full compliance analysis, podcast & MCQs
From £199/year — instant access to all case studies.
View plans
← More Transfers of Value cases ← All case studies